So literally "Almond Bread" is our name for Fractality..?

---

Is it fractality that makes a grid gold?All-Monde Bread:

viveka's question: do the inner and outer ends of 2 vortex spirals have to line up (be parallel) in order for the two vortex spirals to be able to self-embed, or is this a wrong idea about self-embedding? Viveka Note from Dan: It seems to me the above animation, and the 2 immediately below, are examples of a golden mean spiral wrap in 3D which are embedable... in the sense that they can produce an infinite recursive (3d fractal?) zoom.. note the below 2 are the equation I used to make alphabets..

Subject:Almond Bread,Thu, 11 Feb 1999 11:31:58 PST,From: "Altazar LightSeeker" <iamaltazar@hotmail.com>
"The more I read it, the more it makes sense.
Whom does the grail serve?
It's self; I know.
Thanks for the heart warming 3-D valentine...
In heart 3D perspective animation even.
Almond Bread sounds good."

Subject:Great Fractal Valentine...Sat, 13 Feb 99 16:44:44 PST
From: "Jonathan J. Dickau" <jond4u@bestweb.net>

Hello Dan,

I love your Fractal Valentine! It is nice to know that I've been so
blessed, in that my Mandelbrot Cosmology
(http://www.bestweb.net/~jond4u/cosmosis.htm) is significant to this
discussion, and more relevant, overall, than I have been giving myself
credit for. I also appreciated your earlier comment on fractal embedding as
the source of Gravity. It made me think, but didn't quite fit my view.

Comments on your Valentine page were helpful in clarifying this matter.
Here is my reply.

First; in my opinion, the simplest explanation for Gravity is the
so-called push-push theory, which asserts that Gravity is not really a
force, per se, but results from Universal expansion starting on a
microscopic scale (i.e. - everything expands, and pushes against everything
else, so gravity is just inertia vs acceleration from expansion). Recent
results from Astrophysics would seem to support this view, as the expansion
of the Universe is apparently accelerating.

Second; my recent speculative forays
(http://www.bestweb.net/~jond4u/singular.htm, and
http://www.bestweb.net/~jond4u/goinbynd.htm) into Cosmology (inspired by
the January Scientific American) have led me to believe that, while this
may be accurate, it is not the only "correct" explanation, as other frames
of reference yield results which are equally valid. This view may be
helpful, in discovering a way beyond Gravity's pull.

Third; I find some rationale for an Electro-Magnetic explanation of
Gravity in Bernhard Haisch's Zero-Point theories
(http://www.jse.com/haisch/zpf.html), and I believe that it is a natural
answer. Haisch points out that an EM effect which bends light would be
indistinguishable from an actual bending of the Space-Time fabric, because
all of our measurements derive from Optical Geometry (in the observable
Universe), and not from a direct measurement of the actual geometry of
Space, which stands apart from this. Just as Energy encompasses Matter, EM
forces should encompass Gravity. It has been shown that Weak-Nuclear forces
(spin-fields) create changes in Electro-Magnetic fields, and a downward
expansion of this principle would say that EM rules Gravity.

Fourth; it is philosophically satisfying to assume that the Compaction of
Dimensionality, to map a reality known to have higher dimensions onto a 3-D
space, would involve a Fractal aspect in the reduction. In this way, the
loss of information would be minimized, and the Conservation of Information
would be maximized, or optimized.

Fifth; it seems natural that the Golden Mean - Phi Ratio would enter into
the picture, in a significant way, and might (through the principle of
recursion) be the key to how Fractal Embedding of Higher-Dimensional
patterns of structure could carry this process out. Your assertion that
"the converging of waves into self organizing implosion labeled gravity is
directly only made possible by self embedding (fractality) approaching
perfection (phi)" does make sense, in the context that our universe is
inside-out and that this makes the explosion (Big-Bang or Inflation) an
implosion (Gravitational attraction), but there are some gaps in my
understanding.

I do see how this relates (symbolically) to Fractal nature, in suggesting
the Folding of Space, and the "Dimpling" of the Space-Time fabric, but
there are other aspects of this which don't yet make sense. I suppose that
I would need to visualize the underlying sub-space structuring more
clearly, and I will endeavor to work this out. It would seem to relate
fairly explicitly to Richard Marker's Discrete Donut theory
(http://www.ncia.com/~rlmarker/ddtc.htm), but I am not sure exactly how.

More Later. Don't be too surprised if I float past your window, once I
figure this out.

Have a Happy Valentine's Day.

With Love In Light,

Jonathan

Jonathan,
I am so grateful that you have responded to the further image suggestions of
a geometric model of recursion perfected in charge geometry creates
gravity..

...grateful for any way you can help me create meaningful dialog in a more
scholarly way..

now I have more homework to do to more study your links...

I really do deeply believe that

embedding=gravity is more radical than e=mc^2 because it directly teaches
us the charge geometry to conquer gravity electrically as I started pictorially
    ../predictions

..need    to make that article more rigorous..

I had thought for example that my friend
Randy Masters
detailed work to map the PHI harmonic series
in hydrogens balmer emission lines
would be a start to showing matter's slip knot as a compression wave
was in fact waves entering phi-llotactic embedding
so as to implode capacitively, which we call gravity??

aka
the pictorial anu at
../heartsun/HeartofSun.html
 

appreciating your thoughts!

dan winter

finally here..

More on historic significance of GOLD: