Now ask -Why would fractality (in time AND space) specifically by a prerequisite to enable synchronicity? ...
>> BECAUSE constructive charge compression allows radiance - from the fusion point
>> which is specifically super luminal..
>> therefore.. time travel (synchronicity).
( see equation for Golden Ratio defining TIME and charge transfer synchronicity:
Golden Ratio times PLANK TIME= Hydrogen Frequency, the Solar Year, and the Venus Year> goldenmean.info/coincidence

--

The Golden Fractal Wave-

Origin of Centripedal Forces: Gravity, Color, Life, Consciousness and Perception.

by Dan Winter

We are clear the universe is made of waves. Those waves move in a universal compressible background substance ("ether"). Those waves then store compression versus rarefaction (packing versus unpacking - sometimes called yin/ yang)- in that substance called (electric) CHARGE. So in physics 'charge' is in effect the unified field.

Because that fluidly moving hydrodynamic substance called 'charge' stores INERTIA- it then has the quality - of creating MASS. This is because inertia stored (by waves of charge rotating) is the only definition of mass. It is as simple as realizing that when a wave is able to go in a circle instead of a line, it begins to STORE more of its inertia - just like a gyroscope. So - as we have often said- 'God' or the creative principle in essence is the skill to teach waves to start going in a circle (creating mass) instead of line.

The tricky part of keeping a wave going in a circle - instead of in a straight line - is that when the wave finishes making it's circle - it has to meet itself - ('phase lock') - by agreeing on where the crest and the trough will fit. Otherwise - it creates destructive wave interference ... and kills itself.

image- wave rotation

This need for waves to agree on where to meet- forces them to always obey a simple rule. The number one rule for waves is: The wave length must divide evenly into the circumference of the circle they are making. This rule- the origin of 'quantum mechanics' - is the reason there is geometry in the universe. This is because fitting wavelengths into circles - in 2D and 3D- causes those wave to make the pretty pictures - tetrahedron, octa, cube, dodeca, icosa etc. These become group theory.. and the fact that electron shells are basically platonic solids- the same way nuclear particles- (protons/neutrons) nest in the platonic solids.

The illusion that there is such a thing as a particle arose because of the way these waves of charge store their inertia in discrete or 'quantized' little 'envelopes'. These bubbles or wave packets of charge storing inertia - came to be named particles. They are absolutely not 'silver bullets' (which is to say they are NOT solid - but only wave bubbles). The reason the amount of inertia (or mass) stored in each little bubble of waves is so regular or discrete (electrons and protons each store the same amount) - is fascinating.

As waves ran around the universe- for eons- they discovered there were some basic agreements required in order for the survival of those waves. An extremely elegant single universal standard for all waves- call PLANK - (length, time, and energy) - evolved because - right from the beginning waves which did not fit the agreed standard of fitting together - would immediately die (experience destructive wave interference).

In effect - since this one unit of length and time and energy - fit ALL of the waves of the universe- these so called PLANK dimensions define the so called 'sacred' (gold standard of agreement that fits all of physics) - for waves.

The other tricky part about keeping a wave going in a circle ( and thereby creating mass) - is that the inertia the wave stores - tends to immediately get thrown OUT of that circle by centrifugal force. (For the same reason your laundry gets pressed on the outside of the drum during the spin cycle).

So - the only way those waves get to KEEP going in a circle - and remain part of the exclusive club of 'mass creators' is when there is some mysterious centripedal force- which keeps them attracted to the center of the circle (gravity). The cause of THAT force is one of the primary subjects of this book. (Restored centrepetal / implosive forces fractalfield.com/centripetalforces )

We all know that Einstein did not figure out why any object falls to the ground. He got one thing right- that infinite constructive wave compression was the solution to his unified field. The reason physics has not figured out why an object falls to the ground til now, is because of TWO fundamental stupidities:

1. Not knowing how fractality - was a wave / electrical solution to perfect or infinite compression. (Although mathematics has long known fractals are infinitely compressible - physics was slow to figure out what a fractal electric field looked like).

2. Not knowing that Golden Ratio was the ultimate solution to all constructive wave interference - and therefore especially the solution to Einstein's pesky problem: infinite compression. And therefore Golden Ratio is the ultimate solution to fractality.

The essential issue of unified field thinking is to know what electric field shape or symmetry causes gravity to happen. This problem is resolved once we understand for example - that the fractal 'self similarity' (perfected in Golden Ratio) of the nuclear shapes (symmetry) to the electron shells- is the reason atoms have and make gravity. My new equation/ proof that Golden Ratio exponents times planck length very accurately predict multiple hydrogen radii- is an excellent starting point for new evidence.

Gravity is only one of the centripedal forces. Others are color, life force, perception, and consciousness itself. All of these - by appearance- self organizing forces are caused by Golden Ratio - fractality among waves of charge. The purpose of this book is to present the scientific evidence for this statement. And then to explore the technologic and spiritual implications of this new fractal unified field.

-

The evidence the Golden Ratio - fractality ( constructive charge collapse perfected) is the cause and mechanism of gravity:

1. Golden Ratio times Plank length produces exactly the radius of hydrogen. ( My equations: goldenmean.info/goldenproof

So- Golden RATIO constructive charge collapse- is evidentially what is holding hydrogen - and most likely the entire atomic table together.

2. Golden Ratio is the quintessential element of E8 - Unified Field model ( Garrett Lisi et al).

3. Golden Ratio is the universal container of Nassim Harramein - universal of global scaling - of - Length vs Frequency of - Big Bang, Atom, Galaxy and Universe ( Nassim's Table here)

4. The infinite stellated dodecahedron ( dodeca / icosa/ dodeca...) main characteristic is each node has x,y,z values which are simples multiples of Golden Ratio. This produces perfect constructive wave compression and collapse. For this reason - this is the exact geometry of:

a) The universe ( Nature and New Scientist magazine covers)

b) DNA and every living protein

c) the outer electrical shape of gold, palladium, platinum (pgm's), fusion, black holes, the noble gasses, and their corresponding electron valences and nuclear symmetries.

d) the Earth grid.

--

Understanding the mechanism which allows Golden Ratio fractality to BE the cause of gravity is essential to this:

The top down view of the Golden Ratio - pent dodeca- which is the shape of every wave in the above list (DNA, Every Living Protein, Gold/PGM's, Earth Grid, Universe etc) - is essentially 10 spirals of the Golden Mean

pic and animations below..

The reason this shape - essentially accounts for all the universe's centripedal and self organizing forces (gravity, color, consciousness, life force, perception etc)- is as follows:

When waves meet in rotation - at each wave node cross- a portion of the inertia of the wave node (or cross point) - must radiate out in all directions. The wave interference produced in 3D quickly makes DESTRUCTIVE wave interference - (especially if it is cubic) - unless it finds the ONE geometry which allows the wave to continue radiating in ALL directions constructively. That solution is GOLDEN RATIO - and the 3D - what that looks like is the stellated dodeca (pent stars within stars).

As the waves keep crossing- at each point along the Golden Spiral they create,the keep doing what all waves must do in wave interference (called 'heterodyning'). They keep adding AND multiplying (recursive addition) - their wave lengths and their wave (or phase) VELOCITIES.

The Golden Ratio is the obvious only solution to this geometry problem which all waves encounter because this is the ratio that allows BOTH adding and multiplying to continue- in such a way that all the produces (children of the waves) continue to FIT the nest.

Science review continued below with El Naschie...

--------------------------------------------

Here is the latest Imploder Research Results Page: fractalfield.com/implodermagneticresearch

Fractal Field: Technology: The IMPLODER- fractalfield.com/implodernews

------

The New Physics really has the details now:
LOVE is Truly the Cause of Gravity!..

with Dan Winter commentary on Nassim's defense of his Proton as Black Hole physics which Focuses on Golden Ratio: Perfect Embedding IS The Attractive Force!

by Dan Winter - see url (better graphic display than in your email window): goldenmean.info/gravityislove

'In my last life' in this life - while an organist and choir director in several churches- one of our favorite songs was:

God is Love and he who abides in Love abides in God.. and God in Him..

with this article I would like to propose a science corollary to the above:

Gold is Embedding - and he who gets fractal and embeds well (learns to love) gets immortal (wave sustainable- in religious language: 'saved')
- he who does not get fractal and embed well (Golden Ratio defines attraction)... unfortuneately - gets dead.

Why do I call the physics community arrogant and stupid?
(Supposing you wanted to track the AMAZING sequence of events that allowed the PHYSICS COMMUNITY to NOT KNOW why an object falls to the ground- all the while still arrogantly pretending to tell you how the universe works and assembles itself)..

so far I have failed to 'embed well' with conventional physics schizophrenic idea that gravity and charge are made of a different substance
- almost as schizophrenic as the typical religious fundamentalist who is delusionally certain - that his 'spirit' is SEPARATE from physics..
- notice how this separateness- OPPOSITE OF ONENESS- is the root of the political danger posed by religious fundamentalism- being SEPARATE from the unifying logic which embeds us all in pure principle. The scientist who fails to embrace unified field thinking- is exactly LIKE those who irrationally consider their religion- immune from ONEness!

The problem with physicists- is they do NOT know that golden ratio IS the generalized geometry of most constructive wave interference- (evidence: goldenmean.info/matrix ) AND they are not willing to check. This is why they are stuck not knowing that this is ALSO the solution to (charge) compression- and of course (as Einstein said)- perfecting compression IS the solution to unified field - and therefore the solution to gravity. In this article- you see that even Nassim Haramein- who has concluded with exquisite logic- that Golden Ratio is the universal scaling law to all of matter and black holes -he in fact is unaware WHY (because only this geometry actually permits compression- as constuctive interference) See below- so he says: golden ratio is the RESULT of black hole dynamics- when in fact the opposite is the case: golden ratio (perfected charge conjugation of velocity phases) is the CAUSE of black hole and gravity dynamics- which we first taught the physics community 5 years ago in Budapest. (Still we regard this difference with Nassim- in part semantic and gratefully acknowledge his work! Nassim's new article exerpt reprinted below also ) .Paul LaViolette on the other hand in our conversation was evidently - COMPLETELY unaware of the importance of Golden Ratio to physics- so it seems there is no mystery to why he has no room for Nassim's black hole physics in his Sub quantum kinetics.

Seeing the overwhelming evidence that the self-similar FRACTALITY between the nucleus- versus the electrons- is the reason atoms have and make gravity, - (constructive charge collapse is Einstein's notion of gravity- which fractality by Golden Ratio solves) , ... and -

the evidence in my original equation: proof that golden ratio (fractality) is the MECHANISM of the formation of hydrogen,

and that golden ratio is the principle behind the scaling of all masses (Nassim Haramein - also Global Scaling..),

and that golden ratio is the essence of the E8 unified field theory -

- and we showed them the software proof- golden ratio is the generalized solution to ALL constructive wave interference
(and therefore compression, and therefore gravity)
(and therefore all centripetal forces- like gravity and life and perception - and therefore all self-organization)
-... don't you think - as a physicist you would need to check that?

- Well we asked them- (see our interview with Paul LaViolette- guess he didn't think it was important...) .. and they did not.

-- now back to our conversation about Love and Gravity.. and Science:

Was just chatting with Noah- our partner there in Byron Australia- a leader of Byron New Energy Research- he was telling me with great enthusiasm - about what he thought was a high point of Nassim Haramein's ( theresonanceproject.org ) - recent living room presentations there. Our friend Dudly asked if Gravity was really caused by LOVE? And Nassim spent considerable time explaining the science to confirm - that Love really IS the nature of gravity!

First we discoverd Golden Ratio identifies the change in pressure over time- of the TOUCH that says I LOVE YOU: goldenmean.info/touch

Then we discovered (with Korotkov's help- then I implemented in my BLISSTUNER invention - which is now being stolen from me by Frank Van Den Bovenkamp)

that the moment of peak perception- bliss - enlightenment- was defined by Golden Ratio in brainwaves ( goldenmean.info/clinicalintro - EEG power spectra for golden ratio - I pioneered the measurement of bliss /enlightenment - with my BlissTuner invention - now unethically stolen by Frank Van Den Bovenkamp)

-

Then medicine discovered: the healthy heart is a fractal heart. ( References/ pictures: goldenmean.info/holarchy also - goldenmean.info/heartmathmistake

Then - I pioneered the proof that Golden Ratio perfects fractality because being perfect wave interference it is therefore perfect compression

I really got the picture this month- more below- why scientists have been so arrogantly ignorant in not discovering the cause of gravity - after interviewing Paul LaViolette in Athens- about why he did not accept- Nassim's 'black hole' theory in his 'sub quantum kinetics'- It is simple: he is unaware Golden Ratio IS perfected constructive wave interference.. and therefore THE solution to compression - and therefore as Einstein said- the solution to compression is the solution to gravity.

It is my view that all centripetal forces- like gravity, life, consciousness, and black holes, are CAUSED by Golden Ratio in waves of charge.
Nassim- meantime replied- that altho he sees Golden Ratio emerge from his black hole equations repeatedly- he sees it as an effect of black holes/ gravity - not the cause. ... Clearly - from the logic of waves- I say the black hole / gravity is the effect of golden ratio and not the other way around!
- altho some might say that chicken and egg difference- may be just semantic.. at least we agree on the profound importance of Golden RATIOhttp://www.goldenmean.info/ fractality..
AND love :
perfect embedding IS perfect fusion IS perfect compression... ah the romance.
note Nassim's fascinating defense of his Black Hole as Proton below.. exerpted below..

Then I discovered my equation that proved Golden Ratio is what absolutely determines hydrogen geometry - TO CENTER

goldenmean.info/goldenproof

strong evidence that golden ratio is what holds hydrogen together (makes it fractal in space and time- since in addition to derived the radius of hydrogen from golden ratio times planck length - I showed that the frequency of hydrogen essentially links golden ratio to planck time!)

We were well on our way - to showing that Golden Ratio fractal phase conjugation was the origin of all centripetal - forces holding things together- when Nassim showed that Golden Ratio is the "Global Scaling" ( goldenmean.info/globalscaling ) - constant of all major masses: (see Golden Ratio / Phi- SCALING LAW FOR ALL ORGANIZED MATTER- from Nassim - below in this exerpt from goldenmean.info/fractalworld

- end exerpt

I then wrote this up - as a summary that this Golden Ratio fractal phase conjugation is the cause of all centripetal forces at goldenmean.info/selforganization

--

Download Dan Winter's original paper-from the Proceedings of the First-(in the series) of UNIFIED FIELD PHYSICISTS -Budapest 05(&08)-
Exerpt from First Conference Proceedings: Dan Winter - in 05 & 06- First to Hypothesize- FRACTALITY as CAUSE of GRAVITY:
The First to Predict: Gravity's Electric CAUSE- is Golden Ratio FRACTALITY!-Paper -"Is Fractality: The Electrical Mechanism of Gravity,
(and Perception and Color Descrimination) pdf - from the CD / Proceedings: (w/ color graphics) 5.1 Meg : Ch19ADanWinter.pdf ,
Conference Links(w. Nassim, Eliz Rauscher, Richard Amoroso & Many others): goldenmean.info/budapest08/physicsoverview.html

Note: In these films- and at goldenmean.info/scienceofalchemy
Vincent is basically saying the history clearly indicates the original philosophers stone, projective powder of alchemy - was the ground up- meteoritic glass of the
Muslum KABBAH stone..

See the film about GOLDEN RATIO , 1.618 and the MYSTERIES OF THE KABBAH..
(if you are reading this in your email window- in order to see the film embedded- please use the web url version of this article: goldenmean.info/gravityislove

The physics:
when (meteoritic) glass is homogenously propagated wth (platinum group metal) gold vapor - it becomes a potent phase conjugate dielectric..
which is golden ratio capacitance- essentially
(bioactivity example: fractalfield.com/pyraphi )
sometimes called the philosophers stone, or projective powder - see;
www.goldenmean.info/scienceofalchemy
This (Implosive / Centripetal ) FRACTAL FIELD EFFECT- is what here is called -vairocana effect - the life giving field effect core of the HERMETIC revolution.

--------------------------------------

SO... THE EMBEDDING PRODUCED BY LOVE... GOLDEN RATIO - IS- IN FACT - WHAT HOLDS THINGS TOGETHER!

When I first presented my paper "Golden Ratio Fractality-The Electric Cause of Gravity" in the proceedings of our first (of 2) Unified Field Physicists Conference in Budapest - (Nassim, Richard Amoroso, Eliz. Rauscher and many luminaries were present) - the question Elizabeth Rauscher asked me was about the origin of charge and spin.

Origin of Spin: charge as a relatively viscous and compressible medium-

as Paul LaViolette explained during our conversations in Athens last week- his Sub Quantum Kinetics- is clear that mass is basically a connected coherent wave envelope of travelling charge- which stores the inertia called mass. This gives Paul's theory the ability to account for attractions in the plasma between masses- as direct coupling - since every so called atom or particle (envelope of charge) IS essentially a field effect available for all forms of field coupling (no simple billiard balls bouncing around in this discussion- it's all "Wavy Gravy" to use the name of our good friend from years ago.).

So -I suggest- charge is the centripetal versus centrifugal - rarefacton / compression of the background ether. Movcment in that media- which inherently stores the inertia we call 'mass' is only possible in symmetric rotation- (quantized mechanics) because all other movements - would self cancel their waveform. This symmetric rotation stores the inertia called mass, and has the period of rotation- called time. (See fractality in time as the charge coupling origin of synchronicity: goldenmean.info/coincidence )

Rotation is thus the only creator of mass and time. What needs to be added to this insight - is that only fractality - golden ratio conjugation of phases- turns the compression toward center- into acceleration - which then centripetally defines gravity and centripetal forces in general. In other words- the least self cancelling wave form (most constructive interference) IS golden ratio (phase conjugate fractality)- and that is how black holes and gravity happened.

Paul however is clear- that for him - this in NO way accounts for the black hole idea. On this - I think Nassim is very right and Paul is very wrong. The reason Paul LaViolette is wrong on this- became clear - when I further asked him if he was aware that Golden Mean ratio (so essential to Nassim's defense of this Global Scaliing of All Masses) - was in fact the generalized solution to most constructive (charge) wave interference. (My work: www.goldenmean.info/matrix ). This is then what makes Golden Ratio also the solution to constructive wave compression (Einstein's unsolved headache) - and therefore to Gravity and Black Holes and all centripetal forces. (The physics summary I started at goldenmean.info/selforganization )

So because Paul was unaware how fundamental Golden Ratio is to the generation of ALL CENTRIPETAL FORCES - he of course could not grasp the importance of Golden Ratio - in black hole theory (I hypothesize this specifically includes Golden Ratio as the essential cause and mechanism and origin of gravity, life, color , perception , bliss etc).

What I LIKE- is that Nassim - unlike Paul LaViolette- is moving nicely in this direction!

Nassim's evidence- primary defense (exerpt below) of his somewhat controversial proton mass theory is that- it (his Schwarzschield proton geometry) fits exquisitely on the Golden Rato line..-predicting the frequency to size ratio of most ALL of the universes great masses: Planck, Proton, Solar, Galaxy, Universe..

and.." the mass versus radius graph reveals a hidden and profound meaning; that is, that organized matter in the Universe seems to scale in terms of its density towards the black hole condition."

So the attraction and the glue which holds things together- for Nassim- IS the (golden ration nesting) perfect embedding .. LOVE.. of the waves..

The same 'loving embedability / nesting' - ratio you create in a loving touch.. and a blissful mind..!

Animating this geometry - (phase conjugate- implosive FUSION - perfect nesting.. ) we have the romantic..

(New article from Nassim's site- exerpt) " http://theresonanceproject.org/bob.html
... point #2, the gentleman suggests that my Schwarzschild Proton paper has no merit as such, and supports his argument using three comments. I will address them one by one (for a complete rebuttal of his technical criticisms of the Schwarzschild proton, read http://theresonanceproject.org/sp_manifesto.html).

a) 'His overall argument is circular'

This assertion is quite remarkable as The Schwarzschild Proton, while proposing a unification view, attempts to resolve a very significant circular argument found in the standard model. Almost a century ago, when it was determined that there seemed to be a highly charged nucleon at the center of atoms that contained most of their mass and that this entity was composed of particles that somehow must have been held together against their electrostatic charge (Coulomb repulsion), the scientific community at large adopted the concept of some mysterious strong force plucked out of thin air that happened to be in the correct proportion to produce a confinement necessary for proton to proton interaction. Later on it was found that the proton seemed to have internal structures called quarks and since those are confined in an even much smaller space, the color force was elaborated and made to be infinitely strong. Now the strong force at the proton scale was said to be only a remnant of the all-powerful color force of infinite nature mediated by gluons. Nowhere in the standard model is there given an argument for the source of energy that would be necessary to produce a force of infinite nature 'that is, the strongest force in the Universe.

Ironically, this is a perfect example of circular thinking. One finds an error in his or her current physical model that doesn't agree with experiment or observation, then proceeds to invent a new kind of force or even a new kind of matter (in the case of the dark matter/dark energy allegories, see below) then gives this new invention exactly the characteristics necessary to make the initial model work. Then the researcher asserts that the new quantity is confirmed, since it is predicted by the initial model which otherwise fails.

In order for the argument of the standard model to not be circular, a mechanism for the production of an infinite confining force would have had to be given, and this is exactly what The Schwarzschild Proton does. It does so by postulating a certain amount of coherent and polarized structure in the available vacuum fluctuations present at the quantum scale (known to produce foam-like structures in the spacetime manifold, according to the standard model) and contributing to high curvature near or at the horizon. This is not addressed or elaborated on in The Schwarzschild Proton paper, although it is better referenced in the final copy for publication which is not available on the internet yet. However, my earlier papers Collective Coherent Oscillation Plasma Modes In Surrounding Media of Black Holes and Vacuum Structure - Quantum Processes with Considerations of Spacetime Torque and Coriolis Forces and Spinors, Twistors, Quaternions, and the "Spacetime" Torus Topology treated this very issue and showed that soliton-like structures and acoustic plasma solutions found in the neighborhood of horizons demand a certain amount of coherent structure in the vacuum at the quantum level. Therefore, the Schwarzschild paper is not a stand-alone paper, but a continuation of investigation of a certain approach to the structure of spacetime which involves distortions due to torque and Coriolis effect which may produce discreteness at the quantum level resolving the division between the relativistic world and the quantum world. This approach has been successful in predicting many astrophysical phenomenons, including the existence of black holes prior to galactic formation (http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2009/bhbulge/). The following quote is one example from The Origin of Spin: A Consideration of Torque and Coriolis Forces in Einstein's Field Equations and Grand Unification Theory by Nassim Haramein and E.A. Rauscher.

'In this section we have shown that we can modify Einstein's field equations and the Kerr-Newman solution in order to accommodate torque and the Coriolis forces, which we term the Haramein-Rauscher solution. Since Einstein's field equations obey the Laplace-Poisson condition, the torquing of spacetime may be the result of the vacuum gradient density in the presence of matter-energy. Modification of the field equations makes it possible to include the torque terms and hence generate more realistic solutions. These solutions more comprehensively describe the dynamical rotational structures of galaxies, novae, supernovae, and other astrophysical structures which in this case are driven by a spacetime torque. Hence, with the inclusion of torque and Coriolis effects in Einstein's field equations, the spacetime manifold correlates well with the observable mechanisms of black holes, galactic topology, supernova formation, stellar plasma dynamics and planetary science such as ring formation and the Coriolis structure of atmospheric dynamics. This may lead to a model where the driving torque and the dynamical Coriolis forces of the spacetime manifold topology are responsible for the observed early formation of mature spiral galaxies [18]. Further, our model is consistent with galactic structures, the super-massive black hole at their centers, as well as polar jets, accretion disks, spiral arms and galactic halo formations.'

[Reference 18. Robert G. Abraham et al., 'The Gemini Deep Deep Survey.I. Introduction to the Survey,' Catalogs, and Composite Spectra, AJ. 127, 2455.]

The impetus for the Schwarzschild Proton paper was merely to show that when a proton is treated as a mini black hole, its interactive behavior actually predicts well (considering a first order approximation since a full tensor analysis would need to be included using the Kerr-Newman metric and eventually the Haramein-Rauscher solution) the gamma emission, the interaction time and the so-called 'anomalous magnetic moment' of the proton ' which now has been given a source through the polarized vacuum structure.

b) 'The nucleus of a single atom of hydrogen has a mass of nearly a billion tons.'

As the gentleman points out, this may be a silly thing to predict. Obviously, I thought of modifying G and the Planck's scale so that the Schwarzschild Proton mass would come out to the standard value (as others have done http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701006), however my point in this paper is actually to show (and this is why I added a scaling graph) that objects in the Universe from universal size to subatomic particles tend towards the Schwarzschild condition as demonstrated by the scaling graph in the paper.  It was clear to me when I first made the calculation that this would be an issue, and this is exactly why I included a graph based on observational data of the mass of objects in the Universe from universal size to quasars, galactic structures, stellar size objects and so on to see if the Schwarzschild proton mass had any merit whatsoever. Since the initial calculation I have made with the collaboration of Dr. Hyson, we have made many graphs, attempting to find a way to show the standard proton mass to be related to the rest of the objects in the Universe including the Planck's mass.  But in every case, whether it is the log of the mass versus the log of the surface area or the log of the mass versus surface volume ratio, or mass versus entropy (surface), the Schwarzschild condition proton falls nicely on the trend line (in some cases where we have a multitude of objects from Universal size to quasars, large galactic clusters, local superclusters and so on), while the standard model proton always falls completely off the trend line. Therefore, the mass versus radius graph reveals a hidden and profound meaning; that is, that organized matter in the Universe seems to scale in terms of its density towards the black hole condition.

The gentleman asked 'why we never measure this huge mass when we weigh hydrogen (or anything else)'. First of all, here the gentleman makes a common error in his language (and I will assume it is not an error in his understanding of physics), as mass and weight are two different animals (http://www.hitxp.com/phy/cph/020902.htm). More importantly, the issue lies in the fact that so far the standard model has been unable to identify a source for the mass of objects, such as the mass of particles, as the concept of mass is a fairly esoteric concept. The best model so far from the mainstream is the Higgs mechanism which has encountered serious obstacles. Read the Higgs mass under Hierarchy problem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_problem#The_Higgs_Mass. Here the standard model is experiencing issues in predictions that conservatively include some 11 orders of magnitude for unification. There are fundamental issues with the standard model's understanding of mass and energy, although these issues are not commonly acknowledged. The scaling graph in The Schwarzschild Proton paper is much more than a statement about only the proton entity; it is also a statement of relationships in scales defining horizons as a quantization of spacetime.

One of the best examples is the so-called bare mass or bare field in quantum field theory. This issue has been so buried that many physicists are completely unaware of it, and the issue does not even appear as an entry in Wikipedia as very little literature can be found on it. However, the problem is extremely significant, that is, that even the standard model does not come anywhere close to predicting the mass of an atom that has been 'measured' in experimental studies. In fact, when the standard model does an analysis of an electron entity, it finds that this entity must have infinite mass and infinite charge indeed. The approach of the standard model has been to ignore these results and use a renormalization term typically denoted as Z-1 to make the theory agree with experimental studies http://universe-review.ca/R15-12-QFT.htm#Green. This is an enormous fudge factor and in this article discussing it http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.physics/2008-02/msg01081.html and quoting reputable physicists, the gentleman's conclusions are quite telling:

''a bare electron charge and mass is infinite.. something not even Wilson Renormalization Group can get rid of. So I just wonder what is the source of the bare electron infinite charge and mass. What do you think? Initially I think it's something akin to black hole singurality but in reality it may involve more exotic physics.'

In one way the Schwarzschild proton elucidates the fact that the energy potential necessary for confinement must be accounted for and in the final copy of The Schwarzschild Proton (not available on the net yet as it is in the publishing process) we calculate the mass dilation resulting from a proton rotating near relativistic speeds and find that at a velocity of 10^-39 slower than C, the proton exhibits the mass of a Schwarzschild entity. From there, I am planning on addressing the mass issue directly in an upcoming paper, showing that the solution to the Schwarzschild proton, which was only a first order approximation as mentioned above, should be eventually addressed in a Kerr-Newman and more importantly in a Haramein-Rauscher metric, where torque and Coriolis effects are accounted for.  These effects may show that the distortion of the metrical space at the surface event horizon of the black hole structure produces turbulence and high curvature that may not be detectable from a simple long-range mass spectrometer or scattering experiments, which do not examine the highly curved structure near and at the horizon.  In this case the black hole has hairs due to Coriolis effects on the structure of spacetime (Others have come to similar conclusions from completely different approaches http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9201059v1, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9604134v2, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9609084v1, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9202014v1), and it is in that fashion that I am planning on explaining the reason why the current so-called rest mass of the proton is so far off the Schwarzschild condition and the apparent trend of other organized matter in our Universe.

On the cosmological level, this highly turbulent structure of horizons where velocities approach C may be the source of matter creation through sheering of the spacetime manifold itself at the quantum level which predicts a continuous matter creation model at black hole horizons instead of the current Big Bang approach with its dark matter/dark energy allegories http://cosmologystatement.org/. Recent findings http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/03/100318-black-holes-immaculate-conception/ not only confirm the existence of black holes prior to galactic formation but as well may eventually confirm matter creation processes near and at horizons, as in a continuous creation model, instead of the conventional accretion of particles and dust, the source of which has not been identified by the standard Big Bang model http://cosmologystatement.org

c) 'The paper, while using some scientific terms, is presented at a very basic level'Nassim is merely playing with equations from student textbooks'

To this assertion I believe once again that Einstein said it most eloquently, "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." The Schwarzschild Proton paper could have been much more complex, as I had, with the collaboration of Dr. Rauscher and some discussions I've had with Dr. Rowlands :: http://theresonanceproject.org/uni/peter_rowlands.html, found multiple ways to go about it. For instance, in 2003 Dr. Rauscher and I elaborated a solution that comes to almost the same conclusions as the Schwarzschild Proton using QCD and QED. Further, Dr. Rowlands' rewrite system (http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/6544.html) predicts as well singularity-like structures at the atomic scale.

The initial first drafts of the Schwarzschild Proton included many of these more advanced complexities; however my critics had already commented that my earlier papers were complex and too convoluted to make clear my approach. Furthermore, it was important to me for the Schwarzschild proton to be as clear and simple as possible, so that even a college level student could understand the mathematics and follow the logic to its conclusions. There was a certain beauty about this simplicity, and I purposefully stripped any complexities I could, and at the end of the day I may have gone a little bit too far with that idea. What I mean by that is that I could have put a little more beef around the arguments necessary for the reader to understand the approach I am taking and it is important to note that the current available version on the Internet was a draft copy that was not meant for publication. It was produced barely on time for the deadline for the CASYS conference while in the middle of touring during the summer of 2009. The paper will soon be updated as it is undergoing peer review and it was already asked of me to provide better references and to beef up certain sections.

One of the reasons the CASYS group thought of the merit of my paper to be worthy of an award is mostly likely because of my ongoing relationship with this group which has been following the development of my approach throughout the years and they could see the Schwarzschild Proton paper in the context of the other papers I have published.

In point #3, we find a more serious assertion about my alleged fraudulent nature. The gentleman proceeds to comment on an obscure and private discussion between myself and another researcher, Marko Rodin which is actually an illegal video as it was never approved for publication. Nowhere in any text or in any multimedia material do I ascertain the accuracy or the validity of this anecdotal discovery I was considering some years ago. If the accuracy of the relationship between the phi curve and the ninth division of a circle structure defined by Mr. Rodin's mathematics had been fully explored and turned out to be valid, it would be interesting and I would have certainly proceeded in publishing or discussing it in public and so on. However, I did no such thing since I knew very well that the confirmation of the mathematics had not been done and since my interest has been fairly low and my time extremely busy, I had not been able to complete the proof. I actually made that quite clear in an email to a group of researchers in various fields that were inquiring about the approach I took to produce the spiral. A debate flared up and I had to immediately intervene as I was privy to the situation. My email to the group, sent on September 26, 2009, is as follows:

Dear Folks,

I am sorry if I inadvertently contributed to some confusion! I do not have the time to render the math for what I've done but the jepg's and gif animation I created are self explanatory. It is important to realize that when I did this some 5 years ago I mentioned it to Marko in an anecdotal but interesting way. I did not do a full mathematical analysis. If someone is interested I would love to see it as there may be a deeper meaning to it or not.

So thank you again, Dr. Bob-a-thon, for having elucidated this calculation. However I'd like to add that as a first order approximation my finding was approximately 10% off, and a proper analysis would look at the relationship to the Fibonacci sequence, which approximates phi, as is found in nature, where is not found in nature as an exact representation. I'd love to hear the gentleman's thoughts, as he may want to contribute more than criticism and character assassination. Whatever the case may be, to discredit all of my work because I may have had a thought in a private conversation with another researcher that may have been inaccurate or incomplete is inappropriate. In general, I attempt to find everything I can find on the matter before I make public statements that would mislead the population. Having that said, I am sure in the prolific amount of subjects I have studied, that extends from advanced physics to ancient civilization and anthropology, that I have most likely made errors that were not purposefully attempting to deceive. Many errors have been found in the body of work of some of the most prominent physicists and scientists on the planet which does not necessarily discredit their contribution to humanity as a whole. Furthermore, many things that are taught in universities today may be found to be completely incorrect tomorrow and that certainly wouldn't make all the teachers purposefully attempting to deceive the students (although there is a certain tendency in many educators to skip over some of the difficulties that current theories may have in order to maintain an appearance of absolute truth).

In point #4: A question. How is it that there is absolutely no support from any part of the scientific community for any of Nassim's ideas, talks, or research?

Once again, the gentleman jumps to conclusions without having all the facts. Here are a few endorsements from prominent scientists (http://theresonanceproject.org/testimonials.html)) who think that my approach has merit and that throughout the years have been collaborating and contributing to my knowledge base. Furthermore, as I provided links above (and there are more not provided here), other researchers with serious credentials are quickly coming to the same conclusions I have regarding the singular nature of the atomic world.

a) 'because the scientific establishment are afraid of having all their precious theories overturned?'

To that statement, all I can say is that history speaks for itself as any new significant changes that were brought to the scientific community were typically largely resisted, ridiculed and then eventually accepted. As Schopenhauer said, 'All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.' I would like to propose here that there is a movement, which I believe is unstoppable, that will eventually come to conclude that early interpretations of the quantum world were the result of the misunderstanding of the singular nature of atomic nuclei.

This change may take time and the period is directly related to the resistance of the current paradigm to this fundamental change in our view of the Universe. It is not a trivial change, and it is absolutely normal that there is great resistance as the current theories have done an excellent job for a long time. However, we have reached a moment where some of the fundamental issues such as the origin of mass, electromagnetism, spin, and certainly unification, etc. must be addressed.

As for the assertion from the gentleman that mentioned the typical argumentative and unfriendly nature of the scientific community, I believe that these attitudes are one of the most detrimental components to human evolution and transcendence of some of our most tremendous challenges. The scientific community, and certainly the world as a whole, must eventually come to learn that collaboration and constructive criticism always produce a better outcome for everyone than competition and warring, whether as name-calling or literally.

b) 'because scientists are incapable of seeing outside the box that they were trained to think in, and are too proud to accept radical suggestion from an outsider?'

(c) because they haven't come across his ideas yet?

(d) because anyone with an understanding of science can see that his claims and his methods are not scientific in any sense of the term, and that he doesn't actually know what he's talking about?

b), c) and d) are addressed by the answers above. However the gentleman mentions Garrett Lisi as an example of a renegade physicist being accepted by the mainstream scientific community. To this I would reply that Mr. Lisi published a set of equations that very much complements the current approach and as such, it is not a radical change in the perspective of the particle world - (although Mr. Lisi's theory I believe has furthered a specific approach to particle physics, it has of lately been found to have some serious issues http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2658). What's interesting, however, is that once again it is some independent person, in this case a surfer dude living in a van (as I did for many years in order to finance my research) who came to advance the thinking of millions of professional scientists who get, in general, good salaries and can dedicate most of their time to research instead of survival. What does that tell us about the educational system and the current approach to advanced research?

In the case of someone bringing forth ideas that are much more radical, I would like to add this quote from this Associated Press article http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7536665/ns/technology_and_science-science/

Less tolerance for renegades?

"...Maybe there is an Einstein out there today," said Columbia University physicist Brian Greene, "but it would be a lot harder for him to be heard." Especially considering what Einstein was proposing.

"The actual fabric of space and time curving? My God, what an idea!" Greene said at a recent gathering at the Aspen Institute. "It takes a certain type of person who will bang his head against the wall because you believe you'll find the solution."

Perhaps the best examples are the five scientific papers Einstein wrote in his "miracle year" of 1905. These "thought experiments" were pages of calculations signed and submitted to the prestigious journal Annalen der Physik by a virtual unknown. There were no footnotes or citations.

What might happen to such a submission today?

"We all get papers like those in the mail," Greene said. "We put them in the crank file."

Furthermore, comments are made below the gentleman's article criticizing the fact that I have set up various programs and sales in a nonprofit foundation and that these activities are not typical of scientific researchers. Well, in order to eventually get out of my van and be able to continue doing advanced research, not only in theoretical physics but as well in technological developments, it was necessary for me to reach out for public support since I receive no financial support from large institutions or governmental structures. Therefore, I have had to divide my time between running an organization to produce resources necessary for ongoing research, the research itself and, of course, my family responsibilities. This has been most challenging and certainly has not put me in a position of great wealth to this day. The foundation struggles every month to make ends meet (especially in this economy), and my family is barely able to receive the financial support it needs.

Point #5. A similar question. How is it that none of his radical historical ideas have any support from any academic institutions either?

Most of the points given in #5 are also addressed above. This section is where the gentleman proclaims himself and his institution the beholder of the truth and the only truth as if the standard model was a complete and done deal. In the discussion below, confusion occurs because statements are made proclaiming that I encouraged acquaintances to learn specific math skills so that they may help. This does not mean that I don't understand math or that my math skills are not good enough to do what I do. As mentioned in those comments, I am the first one to admit that I wish my mathematical capacity was much higher, but that doesn't mean that it's not good enough to do what I do with some of the help of others. Most physics projects today involve multiple physicists helping each other with various skills. I do understand enough math to write the papers I have written with the help of other researchers, however my extreme dyslexia has been a handicap for most of my life and as such this struggle is not so unusual in the scientific community as Einstein encountered it himself. I do encourage people that want to contribute to the research to learn the math skills necessary to understand the previous work that has been published and to be able to contribute useful and accurate suggestions.

Thereafter there is some discussion about how my work should be classified. There is no doubt that my work in the field of physics belongs in the box of physics and nowhere else. However, the whole of my research does not belong in any of the boxes available in the current mainstream community as it touches areas from advanced physics to philosophy and spiritual concepts and, as such, will never be placed in any conventional box as it is an all-encompassing holistic approach to existence ' and nothing less. The gentleman is quite welcome to disagree with this unusual approach to science and philosophy; however, I would suggest in the future not only that his comments remain professionally based but even that his criticism be constructive and collaborative in nature as I can see that the gentleman has a great mind and a good knowledge base. Once again, we live at a critical time in history where we need to learn to collaborate and contribute to each other with mutual respect, no matter how widely divergent our opinions may be, in order to overcome many of the challenges we are facing today.

Absolute certainty that an idea is wrong'is an attitude that has no place in science and one that discredits the scientific enterprise. ' Brian Josephson, Nobel Laureate

Nassim Haramein
Research Director
The Resonance Project

What and where is the "fusion point" in the phi geometries' constructive charge compression , that"allows" radiance ?

  --

reprinted here: from goldenmean.info/goldenproof

Dan Winter- publishes his new mathematic 'golden' proof: June 14, 09
- How Golden Ratio (Phase Conjugate / Fractality) Causes Gravity www.goldenmean.info/goldenproof

(Credits- site index- see bottom here-- this is goldenmean.info - where else would you expect to read the new proof THAT GOLDEN MEAN- causes gravity.. )

What other explanation could there be?...>

(Dan's new mathematics reveals) - The THREE known GOLDEN RATIO radii of HYDROGEN - actually are a PERFECT MULTIPLE of GOLDEN RATIO times the PLANCK LENGTH (to within about 1/1000 accuracy).

There could be no other explanation than it is this GOLDEN RATIO - that holds these waves of charge together!
- Producing the electrical centripedal force - called GRAVITY!
The ULTIMATE form of global scaling: goldenmean.info/globalscaling

(you might click -save -on this page - because the frequency recipes may be the most important and powerful that have ever been published on this planet- .This is proof- that only fractal fields- actually make gravity AND life- AND implementing this is the ONLY hope our civilization has of survival in the VERY near future.)

Original Physics Equations from Dan Winter: June 14, 09 - as Published goldenmean.info - all other physics journals will need to credit this as first source.

Dan Winter- is well known for being the first to announce Golden Ratio Fractality as the Electric Cause of Gravity- in his Budapest 2006 Paper, Presented & Published with the proceedings- International Unified Field Conference: www.goldenmean.info/budapest08/physicsoverview.html .- a view now supported by the mathematics of El Naschie. Here are Winter's new-elegantly simple equations. He also has widely published his prediction: Atoms MAKE Gravity to the Extent that their nucleus is FRACTAL TO - SELF SIMILAR TO- EMBEDDED (by Golden Ratio) - in & to their electrons: www.goldenmean.info/creation

Acknowledgement for support from Salvatore Giandinoto PhD for help with the mathematics and for his help making the biological measurements!

So - our international-research team- on the- Frequency Keys- to Hydrolysis & Hydrogen- just came up with HOW - the famous KANSIUS ('Can Water Fuel the World!) - got his frequency key to split hydrogen. He took the known sputtering frequency of Palladium (phase conjugate/ PGM!) - 13.56 Mhz. He found out that this radically reduced the power needed to split hydrogen from water. Even the noble Rustum Roy - quickly realized this was the end of Earth's energy crisis. (Check the films and links- water IS power- when you can directly ring out the hydrogen).

I decided to apply the mathematics I had originally discovered to produce the key frequencies I use to make phase conjugate dielectrics. With these frequency recipes- in Phase Conjugate dielectric- materials - I have been able to produce 50% growth increase- measured - in bioactive fields. ( goldenmean.info/phaseconjugatewaterconfidential). The key is to know that the GOLDEN MEAN- and PLANCK TIME CONSTANT (and PLANK LENGTH) define the sacred- and the bioactive - and phase conjugation (and gravity)! I had multiplied the Plank time constant times PHI powers- to get my magic frequency for EVERYTHING. (Take a lesson - you folks who talk about 528 hz - Len Horowitz- and 8 hz etc. being sacred- we KNOW what sacred frequencies are!).

So I took my same original equation- and applied it to Kansius's Palladium / Hydrogen frequency - guess what - I got a perfect multiple of GOLDEN RATIO - to many places of accuracy:

So now I knew how to derive most any 'sacred' and bioactive - and hydrogen ringing frequency.

Note here: if you have commercial resources to participate- in our Hydrolysis & The FREQUENCY Solution- project- we have films of results (hydrogen overflowing)- we are ready for your serious partnership: danwinter@goldenmean.info

SO- I decided to go deeper. I had been so thrilled to find the work - of Heyrovska (below) - showing GOLDEN RATIO - accurately in the radii of hydrogen and many related ions. I devised a test. If I was right- that:

Gravity is an electric field coupled by Golden Ratio (perfect charge collapse) at (universal ) quantum distances:
(Perfect Charge Collapse- IS Golden Ratio Phase Conjugation - / Fractality)

Then - the exciting new listings of the Golden Ratio radii in hydrogen ( from Heyrovska- below)
- I hypothesized SHOULD be whole number multiples of GOLDEN RATIO - times the PLANK LENGTH...

I did the calculations (thanks Sal for your moral support).. and guess what-

WE HAVE THE PROOF-- GRAVITY's CAUSE:

Planck Length (1.616252 x 10^-35 meter) x Golden Ratio (1.618033989) ^ 116 power = .282537 Angstrom -The First Radii of Hydrogen (below)

Planck Length (1.616252 x 10^-35 meter) x Golden Ratio (1.618033989) ^ 117 power = .457154 Angstrom -The Second Radii of Hydrogen

Planck Length (1.616252 x 10^-35 meter) x Golden Ratio (1.618033989) ^ 118 power = .739691 Angstrom -The Third Radii of Hydrogen

Compare the calculation from Winter above - with Hydrogen experimental base below- (Heyrovska) .28 Angstrom, .46 Angstrom, .74 Angstrom. (1 Angstrom = 10 ^-10 meter)
(Equations above from WINTER) - This next section BELOW is exerpt fromDr. Rajalakshmi Heyrovska (Raji Heyrovska, Ph. D.)Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic. http://www.jh-inst.cas.cz/~rheyrovs/
"...the energy of atomic hydrogen is actually equivalent to the energy of the simplest atomic condenser with the Golden mean capacity"

The Golden ratio, ionic and atomic radii and bond lengths Author: J. Heyrovsky, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic - This work arose from the author's finding that the ratio of the radius of hydrogen, estimated recently (C.H. Suresh, N. Koga, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 5940 (2001)) by density functional methods, to the ground state Bohr radius is the Golden ratio, which operates in a variety of natural phenomena. It is found that the Golden ratio indeed plays a quantitative role in atomic physics. The interesting results are (1) that it arises in atomic dimensions due to the electrostatic forces between negative and positive charges; (2) that the energy of atomic hydrogen is actually equivalent to the energy of the simplest atomic condenser with the Golden mean capacity; (3) that the origin of two terms in the Rydberg equation for absorption and emission is in fact in the ground state term; (4) that all atoms can be assigned definite values of cationic and anionic radii based on the Golden ratio and covalent radii; (5) that these radii are additive and explain quantitatively bond lengths like those of alkali halides, of hydrides of many elements and of many other bonds, whether covalent or ionic or both; and (6) that the work functions of alkali metals can be evaluated using the bond lengths.

R. Heyrovska- Articles on the Golden ratio-based ionic radii and on the additivity of atomic and ionic radii in bond lengths etc: 132. The Golden ratio in the creations of Nature arises in the architecture of atoms and ions. Chapter 12 in: "Innovations in Chemical Biology", Editor: Bilge Sener, Springer.com, January 2009; ISBN-10: 1402069545, ISBN-13: 978-1402069543 (Proceedings of the 9th EurasiaConference on Chemical Sciences, Antalya, Turkey, September 2006; Invited Lecture). 133. Golden Sections of Interatomic Distances as Exact Ionic Radii &Additivity of Atomic and Ionic Radii in Chemical Bonds ( 1. ) ( 2. 134. Golden sections of inter-atomic distances as exact ionic radii of atoms 135. Atomic Structures of Molecules Based on Additivity of Atomic and/or Ionic Radii 1. The Golden ratio, ionic and atomic radii and bond lengths, R. Heyrovska, Special Issue of Molecular Physics, 103 (2005) 877 - 882. 2.  Fine structure constant, anomalous magnetic moment, relativity factor and the Golden ratio that divides the Bohr radius 4.  Dependence of the length of the hydrogen bond on the covalent and cationic radii of hydrogen, and additivity of bonding distances 5. Dependences of molar volumes in solids, partial molal and hydrated ionic volumes of alkali halides on covalent and ionic radii and the Golden ratio. 6. Atomic Structures of Molecules based on Additivity of Atomic and/or Ionic Radii. 7. Various Carbon to Carbon Bond Lengths Inter-related via the Golden Ratio, and their Linear Dependence on Bond Energies. 8. The Golden ratio in the creations of Nature arises in the architecture of atoms and ions. 9. Golden Sections of Interatomic distances as Exact Ionic radii and Additivity of Atomic and Ionic Radii in Chemical Bonds.

Commentary from Dan Winter- continued-

HOW Golden Ratio Fractal Phase Conjugation - Causes Gravity: Perfect wave collapse- (Einstein's definition of gravity) has to couple the inertia of compression during rotation - with that of acceleration. This is the very nature of gravity. Only the golden mean path with the power to make wave interference constructive in both addition and multiplication- solves this problem. Gravity is the Golden Ratio CONSTRUCTIVE adding and multiplying of (charge) wave VELOCITIES- producing ACCELERATION.- The portion of the rotational inertia known as mass- is coupled to the experience of acceleration which waves of charge experience in the presence of this golden ratio fractality ('golden quantum field theory' El Naschie) which causes gravity. Gravity is a coupling of electric fields which happen due to how they are phase locked at very short wave (and very universal) quantum lengths. The premiere spectral distances being in the golden ratio wave fractality or 'self similarity' which describes how the nucleus must embed in its electrons- which allows atoms to make gravity.

In this model - further- charge is identified as the net difference betweeen rarefaction and compression generated when these compressional waves traverse the either. The electron then becomes not a point source, but rather a very small slip knot - we point to the work of Gautier.. (below). That slip knot itself participates in the fractal or gordian knot that is gravity precisely by utilizing again golden ratio curvature- because that defines optimized translation of vorticity. Hydrodynamics has long known this optimized coupling of rotational inertia to linear inertia - was the definition of the golden mean spiral path . What they had not discovered - was that it is precisely this characteristic of the golden mean curvature - which makes this spiral wave path for charge- the only way to acheive non-destructive wave collapse. therefore making this golden mean fractality the creator of the phenomenon of charge acceleration .. called GRAVITY.

Dan Winter

ote:

	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-Gk_Ddhr0M&feature=related
Image / animation credit: by Michelle Chang with Helen Han and Temple Simpson. "This animation presents the geometry that is the basis of many of Fuller's key ideas and concepts. At the beginning, twelve spheres are packed as closely as possible around a single central sphere. As the spheres shrink and disappear, they generate a polyhedron in which all edges and all radii are of equal length. This shape is what Fuller called a vector equilibrium. One of the characteristics of a vector equilibrium is its ability to contract by folding in on itself. The animation demonstrates how this simple geometric shape can be transformed to create several complex polyhedra. Next, it produces a different version of a vector equilibrium that Fuller called tensegrity‚Äö-short for a stable structure of tensional integrity. In the last part of the animation, a map of the entire globe is transferred onto the vector equilibrium, which unfolds to produce a flat map of the earth made from six squares and eight triangles." more at linkh -note from Dan -prelude to HOW- Earth Grid Fractality IS the solution to .. Global Warming.. and Magnetosphere..	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-Gk_Ddhr0M&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba3W_9K9fzM&feature=related	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xHw9zcCvRQ&feature=related
	The magazine article comment (about Lisi) even says: "Harken back to the Buckyball."(Dodec / Icos)

As you watch the JITTERBUG- the wave collapse of the CUBEOCTAHEDRON (powers of two internal wave ratios) - to the ICOSA (/dodeca ) (with its powers of GOLDEN RATIO internal wave geometric)- observe that you are witnessing the beginning of PERFECT WAVE COLLAPSE.. This jitterbug has been presented at international conferences as the MECHANISM OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY (Tom Sawyer) .

It is reassuring to find out now - that when my friend Bucky Fuller taught me personally that this JITTERBUG (standing wave?) was important because it had (quoting) " the characteristics of a vector equilibrium is its ability to contract by folding in on itself". The great part is that in this sentence Bucky himself had identified the (Golden Ratio) - mechanism of the CAUSE OF GRAVITY (perfected wave collapse) : a perfect golden path for waves of charge to fold in on themselves!

Bucky Fuller's VECTOR FLEXOR doing the JITTERBUG- revealing as the (octave) CUBEOCTA- JITTERBUGS (perfect heart centered collapse) it creates a GOLDEN MEAN FOLDING PATH- to the (golden ratio stellated) ICOSA...

..revealing as the THIRTEENTH SPHERE (nested in perfect cubeocta) - DISSOLVES BY PERFECT EMBEDDING / COMPRESSION- IN TO THE OTHER TWELVE- which then collapse inward to the ICOSA>>

The THIRTEENTH SPHERE WHICH IS ABSORBED BY PERFECT COMPRESSION INTO THE BODIES OF THE OTHER TWELVE- IS CALLED THE CHRISTED ONE.. THE PRINCIPLE CHRISTOS (how waves crystallize into mass by perfect sharing - non-destructive compression)
-below E8 Image- credit Garrett Lisi

(return to commentary from Winter): E8 is easier to grasp when we see that golden ratio is the glue that holds it together...

By not emphasizing the fact that E8 is based largely on Golden Ratio - Garrett Lisi misses the principle.. namely what produces - the centripedal force holding it together (producing gravity). Thus as El Naschie's work on the golden ratio mechanism thruout E8 - demonstrates- this is the primary geometry which holds it together.

If you read El Naschie's 108 or more international papers - on largely Golden Ratio nature of E8- it becomes easier to understand why he calls this 'golden quantum field theory' the basis for how - as he suggests- the fractal nature of space CAUSES gravity.

(BELOW- From our original discussion of Garrett Lisi and E8: goldenmean.info/caughtinthematrix
More Thoughts on El Naschie - Physics of GOLDEN RATIO symmetry- from goldenmean.info":
1. Fractal Vacuum:Fractality Ultimately Defines Energy Efficiency AND Sustainability-&Consciousness?
construction recently expounded in the book by Lapidus and Frankenhuysen, it is shown how the complexified extension of El Naschie's Cantorian-Fractal spacetime model belongs to a very special class of http://www.goldenmean.info/fractalvacuum/